Comments on: The Manliness Roundup: Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt Edition

By: Lance

Lance — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:56:03 +0000

Hey Kevin, thanks for the shoutout! I just noticed your roundup and saw we were on it, cool.

@Kate: Sorry you’re not into marathon sex or kinky stuff. I have actually established a relationship with Gina, so this wasn’t a ONS. Our blog is a sex & dating blog, and some of my sex posts are primarily technical in nature so people can get see what’s out there in terms of dating and sexual technique. Thanks for stopping by though.

Lances last blog post..Weekend Roundup: TSB Edition

By: Kate

Kate — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:14:31 +0000

Alright Kevin, what was the point then exactly? It’s not to show the importance of sex in a long-term relationship, because Lance had sex the night he met this woman. And if the point was that you should make sure to find someone with whom you can have that kind of sex, there are lots of ways of writing about that without talking about “shooting a load on her chest” and having “pooper sex.”

By: dadshouse

dadshouse — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:26:34 +0000

Nice round-up, thanks for the shout out. I didn't catch that particular Honey and Lance post, but in general I'm a fan. Lance gives a "pick-up artist" take on dating, like Mystery from the VH-1 show. Sometimes Lance is pretty sexually direct, and I gloss over that because otherwise he gives an interesting glimpse into one very real part of our culture. Honey usually offers a more traditional take on dating and relationships. The mix of the two can be quite good. dadshouses last blog post..Flirty Text Messages on Craigslist

By: Kevin

Kevin — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:14:49 +0000

@Kate – Thanks for reading. Sorry your feel that way. You missed the point, but of course, your opinion is always respected around here.

@Jeremy – you have a great site and I appreciate you writing it.

@Frugal – we actually have done a few things like this around the house and it is definitely a cheap way to make something worthless back into something useful again…

By: Kate

Kate — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:49:43 +0000

Wow. Not only is the “Dirtiest, Filthiest Sex” post not for kids, it’s also not for anyone with the slightest bit of class. For a site that purports to regale its readers with posts about inspiring men and manly virtues, and recently wrote a post on chastity, linking to drivel about a man’s explicit sexual exploits is highly ironic.

“The importance of this post was the fact that the sex portion of a long-term relationship is a very important piece.”

Um, did you read the same post I did? Where was the long-term relationship here? This was the story of a douche bag that talks about “opening sets”(gag)with a women he just met, fingering her at the bar (!) and on the way home a short time later, and then having a marathon of sex. Any man who would so explicitly detail his conquests for anyone to see is a tool of the highest order, and anyone who would link to such a post has no claims on being a gentleman.

By: Jeremy (Discovering Dad)

Jeremy (Discovering Dad) — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:21:36 +0000

I agree with Frugal Dad – great roundup! Thanks for including me, and thanks for participating in the conversation throughout the week during the What Dads Think series.

Jeremy (Discovering Dad)s last blog post..Spotlight on Dads – Matt Pfingsten

By: Frugal Dad

Frugal Dad — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 18:02:48 +0000

Great roundup! Thanks for sharing my article with your readers. I particularly enjoyed the speakers into storage article – what a great idea! I’m off to search the attic for those ridiculously large speakers I’ve stored since college.

Frugal Dads last blog post..Sunday Conversation #8 – Kids and Money Matters Edition